You Say You Want a Revolution? Not so much.
Bernie Sanders burst on the scene talking about a revolution. But for any of Bernie’s ideas to see daylight, much less work, an actual revolution was needed, where the voting populace rose up in a body and swept away the Ancien Régime – starting with the centrist, third-way, DLC, blue dogs in the Democratic Party – en route to crushing the GOP and taking back the House and the Senate, so that President Sanders could lead a liberal Congress to sweeping reforms unprecedented since the early FDR years.
Unfortunately, most people viewed this as more of a metaphorical revolution, where the conversation got moved far to the left in anticipation of winning just for showing up against a fragmented Republican Party. In fact, the true revolution has already happened: Antonin Scalia died with a Democrat in office. In order to lock the revolution in place, all we need do is elect any Democratic President, then a whole plethora of evil can be undone: SCOTUS decisions, like Citizen’s United and Buckley v Vallejo, Heller, Michigan v EPA, and a host of unconstitutional states’ laws – basically, the entire ALEC playbook, plus bathrooms – can be shoved back into the festering pit of sewerage whence they came.
What this leaves is Bernie Sanders at the head of a Revolution of One because, while he correctly read the mood of discontent with the choices, he ended up not being that choice, so much. What’s more,this outcome was predicted last fall, by the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), “…a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to research at the intersection of religion, values, and public life.”
Last November, PRRI released their 2015 American Values Survey aptly named “Anxiety, Nostalgia and Mistrust.” In it, they asked specifically about the appetite for continuing the Bush and/or Clinton “dynasties.” Here is their summary of those results (emphasis added):
More than six in ten (61%) Republicans—including 64% of likely Republican primary voters—and nearly seven in ten (69%) Tea Party members say that electing another Bush or Clinton would be bad for the country, compared to 42% of Democrats overall and 39% of likely Democratic primary voters.
Further on in the summary, they characterize the state of the Democratic race, saying Hillary Clinton was supported by 55% of Democratic respondents, while Sanders and Biden (who dropped after the survey was conducted but before the survey was published) total about 40%.
To date, the popular vote percentages in the primary race: Clinton 56, Sanders 42
To date, the pledged delegate percentages in the primary race: Clinton 55, Sanders 45
Latest national poll released May 5, Clinton v Sanders: Clinton 54, Sanders 42
What this tells us is that, since Sept-Oct of last year (the period of the survey), the pro-Clinton / anti-Clinton numbers have not changed. Thus we can characterize the “Revolution” as more of a protest, whether against Hillary qua Hillary, or as an avatar for more-of-the-sameism. While conceding that Bernie Sanders qua Bernie Sanders has done very well, Bernie Sanders as the Clinton alternative had a national hard ceiling he never broke through.
I encourage you all to read the survey, it’s a compelling snapshot of voter attitudes, with much that is cautionary, but MUCH to build on, during the second half of the Clinton “dynasty.”