I Guess We Ought To Write A Book
Well, lookie here.
It appears that the FEC just sent Trump a letter outlining his illegal political contributions. Honey, it is 373 pages long. There are novels shorter than that.
You can see the names right here.
Campaigns hire people to do this – to make sure that contributions are legal before they are submitted. Apparently Trumps hires all the best people for these jobs, too.
Thanks to Alfredo over at the Dairy Queen for the heads up.
Grifty bitch, whiny bitch, lyingest bi… ad infinitum.
1I’m sure Bill Barr will get the DOJ right on this.
(/sarcasm)
2Just glancing at the first few pages, I’m wondering if these bozos thought that FEC wouldn’t notice all those small contributions and didn’t have the ability to add 2+2. I’m not surprised that the people in the Orange Moron’s campaign are unfamiliar with, you know, actual campaign finance laws. Why should his campaign have any more expertise than the folks actually hired to run the government?
3Who the hell makes a political contribution of $26.92?
4Unfortunately for Trump, it’s not a book. Otherwise he would have threatened that it contains classified information (every dollar from me is classified), or that a non-disclosure agreement was signed by the FEC.
5Sandridge @1, when I read your list, in my head I heard, “Soft kitty, warm kitty, little ball of fur. Happy kitty, sleepy kitty, purr, purr, purr,” from The Big Bang Theory.
I think we got the makings of a new song!
6Malarkey @6, You write the lyrics, I’ll sing ’em [and thereby bring on the end times ].
.
Take out the trash, Joe!:
7https://images.dailykos.com/images/817627/large/104221981_909395656246822_8956566400188070431_n.jpg?
And I see the address is Trump Tower – not his home state of Florida?
8Some of the contributions are preceded by a minus sign. What does that indicate?
9[i]Who the hell makes a political contribution of $26.92?[/i]
It was probably a nice round 2,000 Rubles before the credit card transaction got converted to dollars.
10Harry@9: Probably a refund, but the question is if it was initiated by the donor or the campaign.
I suspect a lot of them are from some hidden auto-deposit checkbox that the donors did not notice when they agreed to cough up $5 from the social security check. Possibly from some irate losers who keep calling up their credit card companies to get a charge-back, unaware or unwilling to believe that the Trump campaign would grift them this way.
11