You Have To See This
What kind of junior stinkin’ senator takes on Diane Feinstein? The kind who wants to go home with his hiney whipped, that’s who.
.
March 14, 2013 By: Juanita Jean Herownself Category: Uncategorized
What kind of junior stinkin’ senator takes on Diane Feinstein? The kind who wants to go home with his hiney whipped, that’s who.
.
Welcome to The World's Most Dangerous Beauty Salon, Inc.
My name is Susan DuQuesnay Bankston. I live in Richmond, Texas, in the heart of Tom DeLay's old district. It's nuttier than squirrel poop here.
I am honored and privileged to know Miss Juanita Jean Herownself, hairdresser extraordinary and political maven. Since she does not have time to fiddle with this internet stuff, I type her website for her and you can read it if you want to. If you don't, she truly does not give a big bear's butt.
A lot of what I post here has to do with local politics, but you probably have the same folks in your local government.
This ain't a blog. Blogs are way too trendy for me. This is a professional political organization.
I just loved the way she smacked the smirk off that little jerk’s face. He couldn’t look like a bigger putz if he tried. She should have asked him the right of the people to “bear arms” includes nuclear weapons.
1Diane Feinstein has just executed the greatest Senate slap-down in 58 years, since 1954 when Army counsel Joseph Welch exclaimed to Joseph McCarthy: “Senator; you’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
We can only hope that her rebuke to this dipwad Cruz survives as long and memorably as Welch’s rebuke to McCarthy. Like McCarthy, Cruz does not deserve the term “The Honorable United States Senator.”
As to Sen. Feinstein’s public apology when the hearing was ending following the vote on the bill, that really was her apology to the Senate for her rare breach of Senate decorum, not out of any kindness to a so-called senator who deserves no kindness. She essentially acknowledged disappointment in herself for falling short of the traditional standard of behavior that she believes is expected in that legislative body. It is a standard of politeness to which Cruz neither understands nor appears to aspire. After all, junk yard dogs are very difficult to house train.
2JJ,
I was just about to hit “send” with this article from PoliticusUSA about Ted McCarthyWannabe~thanks for the video, but we would enjoy “eversomuch” your take on the DiFi “takedown of BaggerBoy:
http://www.politicususa.com/diane-feinstein-cuts-ted-cruzs-attempt-mansplain-constitution.html
3Drat, typos…need to cut fingernails…again. Sorry
4Aww, bless his little Canadian heart. He’s trying to look like a big boy today.
Respect your elders, Junior or she’ll spank ya next time.
5I really wish we had a Diane Feinstein representing Texas instead of the ones we do.
6I really wish he and Cornyn would wear beanies with propellers. Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dumber.
7I think it is the right to arm bears.
DiFi has forgotten more than idiot has even the capacity to learn.
8Ted is just plain pathetic, but clueless. The GOP big boys find him useful as a red herring. Better he should be shot at while they go about their dirty work under the radar.
9DiFi knows about weapons and murderers. She was a witness to the murders of Harvey Milk and the others in San Francisco. Probably about the same time Ted Cruz was pulling the wings off butterflies when he was in short pants
10Sorry, but I just have to point out that Ted Cruz looks a lot like Gene Wilder in “Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory” except with dark hair. Maybe he’s hoping to win an Oscar in his next career.
11In response to Ted’s display of Constitutional ignorance, Chris Mathews said, “I don’t understand how people can elect somebody like Ted Cruz….”
Read more – it’s worth it:
12http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/14/matthews_dont_understand_how_people_can_elect_somebody_like_ted_cruz.html
What an insufferable know-it-all this little man is. I think even his own party is catching on that he is not helping them at all – especially not in the Senate (the House is crazy). As I have also seen pointed out, nothing in the Bill of Rights grants ABSOLUTE immunity from government intervention – i.e., don’t yell fire in a crowded movie theater even if you think you have a 1st Amendment right to free speech and therefore should be immune from any consequences. Actually, that is what gets me about so many yahoos – they think the First Amendment means that they – not you – cannot suffer ANY consequences. It’s like a stupid kid thumbing his nose at you when he knows ABSOLUTELY nothing about what he’s talking about. God save me from these congenital idiots.
13I’m not really sure what she’s apologizing for. I would have been a lot ruder than she was. I think she handled him well. It seems like he gets a kick out of getting a rise out of people.
14@Barb,
15But she didn’t wipe the smirk off his face! It stayed there, nicely frozen, while whatever brain cells hide behind it either tried desperately to understand Sen. Feinstein or whirled around trying to escape.
Do you suppose he practices that face, assuring himself he looks confident and knowledgeable?
It’s not working. I can see the sweat through the computer screen.
I watched the whole thing on Cspan. It was truly lovely. Thank you for making my day!
16Ted is out of his league, and he doesn’t even know it! Of course he has a bunch of equally moronic supporters who encourage his behavior, which is unbecoming for a US Senator. What an embarrassment.
17@cairocat: I stand corrected. I wonder when he’s going to realize what a boo-boo he made. He probably doesn’t understand why she had to apologize, though.
18Sent this evening via Cruz’s web site–I just couldn’t sit here seeing that sorry sumbitch without at least writing:
Your performance today in the Senate Judiciary Committee in questioning the Committee Chair was incredible in the true meaning of the word, irrelevant, disrespectful, and an embarrassment to the people of Texas and this nation.
Every constitutional right is subject to reasonable restriction. Even Justice Scalia acknowledges that fact.
As a constituent, I hope not to see such grandstanding and ignorance on your part in the future–though I fully expect that hope to be trashed before this month is over.
19Am I the only one who thinks he looks like Count Chocula?
20Steve in Austin — good job!!!
21I think he looks like a used car salesman. Would YOU buy a used car from him?
22All things considered, I thought she was exceedingly polite, but I’m from Independence and we didn’t see a thing wrong with the way Truman talked so my views are inherently suspect.
If I might make a comment about Carnival Cruz’s (thank you for that Susan), rejoinder to Feinstein: it smacked of patting her on the head and telling pitiful little girl child to calm down and not get her knickers in a knot. It is just a guess but i don’t think he would have done that if she was a he. He is not just an idiot with no sense of decency or decorum he is a paternalistic, sexist, with no sense of decency or decorum. Who, were he to rub all the tiny bits of brain matter he possessed together – would still be unable to light a fire. In some respects this is fortunate, as a walk through the oceans of this man’s soul would scarcely get your feet wet. It is probably best not to have a fire in such an environment!
The Supreme Court has long held that all rights are subject to regulation. The First Amendment for example, (something Cruz only believes in relative to himself), is subject to time, place and manor restrictions. You can’t yell fire in a crowded theater any more than you can incite a riot with impunity – most high school civics students get that, then again maybe Cruz missed that day. Likewise he and his buddies Scalia and La Pierre always skip right over the first part of the second amendment, the modifying clause that says, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state…” It would be ever so nice if someone would call his dishonorable attention to the phrase WELL REGULATED, seems to me like that means we can regulate arms. It says so, right there……
23Count Chocula! Love it.
24Deb and Steve – well-spoken.
25That was a thing of beauty..
26We all have a responsibility to help Texas to get rid of cruz and loony louie and all the other crazies.
27If we help Texas we help ourselves.
The devil’s advocate was vanquished by the voice of truth and goodness.
28She’s amazing.
This is not Feinstein’s first turn in the arena. Larry Craig (of wide stance fame) once tried something similar on her. I’m not surprised he has a wide stance after what she did to him.
29http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/16/local/la-me-0116-theweek-20110116
Hey, it’s hard work being a Koch Pimp. Poor Little Teddy Crud.
And I, too, blasted that sorry SOB on his website. We ALL need to be doing that… and yes, unfortunately, there are many opportunities to do so. Give it a day or two, and there will be another prime opportunity. The hits just keep on coming.
But I have to wonder, along with Chris Matthews…. who elects people like this? Texans. Cruz is their Rock Star, wants to be President, and I wonder if his birth certificate will become an issue with the birther crowd.
30What a silly little boy Cruz is proving himself to be!
31Have been on the road, finally got to see this. A thing of beauty. Thank you, DiFi. And thank you JJ for putting it where I will surely see it!
32