Whirlwind
Okay, so first Bob Mueller subpoenas Deutsche Bank’s records on all members of the Trump family.
Deutsche Bank, which has loaned the Trump organization millions of dollars for real estate ventures, said it would not comment on any of its clients.
Deutsche Bank is pretty much a full fledged criminal enterprise all on it own, using mirror trades to laundry money for Russians to the tune of $10 billion. And that’s not all. They are real stinkers …
Scandals have proliferated at Deutsche Bank. Since 2008, it has paid more than nine billion dollars in fines and settlements for such improprieties as conspiring to manipulate the price of gold and silver, defrauding mortgage companies, and violating U.S. sanctions by trading in Iran, Syria, Libya, Myanmar, and Sudan. Last year, Deutsche Bank was ordered to pay regulators in the U.S. and the U.K. two and a half billion dollars, and to dismiss seven employees, for its role in manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate, or libor, which is the interest rate banks charge one another.
So, I am sure it’s just pure damn coincidence that the Wall Street Journal editorial board took a vicious slam at Mueller again, saying that removing the guy who sent anti-Trump messages proves that Mueller cannot conduct a “fair and credible probe.”
However, here’s where it gets a bushel basket of hypocrisy.
At the end of October, the WSJ wrote of Mueller …
… the board reacted to news that former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was being charged in connection with Mueller’s probe by saying that “the main charge against Donald Trump is poor judgment for hiring the notorious Beltway operator.”
Oddly enough, they didn’t call for Trump’s removal because he couldn’t be credible for hiring Manafort.
Oh wait, did mention that the Wall Street Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch?
If you want to know the significance of anything Mueller is doing, check the Wall Street Journal editorial page and see how big a hissy fit they are throwing.