As expected, the SCOTUS ruled that individual states cannot keep an insurrectionist off their own state ballot. The opinion was unanimous. But what isn’t talked about as much in the media is what the majority did next, which was writing in a new constitutional provision specifically designed to protect none other than the subject of the ruling, TFG. Even though the opinion was unanimous, it was unanimous only in saying the states can’t ban insurrectionists from the ballot. The four women justices disagreed when the Trump Wing of SCOTUS went far beyond the question before the Court, adding a new requirement that a candidate can only be blocked under the 14th Amendment by FEDERAL LEGISLATION, which, in the current environment, is impossible. It doesn’t impose that same rule on other provisions of the 14th Amendment such as the two term limit, just the insurrectionist provision. So the Trump Wing of SCOTUS actually wrote in a new Constitutional requirement to disqualify an insurrectionist. This is called legislating from the bench. And again, done so in the service of TFG to help him take over the US government in January 2025.
The Trump Wing of the SCOTUS often hides behind federal legislation in its opinions to help their own political party. One glaring example of this is when they declined to stop clearly unconstitutional state gerrymandering that has permanently disenfranchise millions of voters like those of us in Texas where Dems have to win 58% of votes in districts statewide to have a chance of taking a majority of Congressional seats. SCOTUS says it’s not its job to protect from that, so disenfranchised voters have no recourse for justice.
So the SCOTUS continues to run interference for TFG, helping him run out the clock to the election in November. Oh, and by the by, Clarence Thomas once again didn’t recuse in a case where he is clearly conflicted.
Your welcome.