Biden Proposes SCOTUS Reforms. Finally.
In a oped piece in the Washington Post this morning, Joe Biden proposed common sense reforms to the SCOTUS. It would have been really nice had he proposed those 3 1/2 years ago rather than as a lame duck president, but it’s a badly needed proposal. In those years of dawdling, an obviously corrupted court has taken a hatchet to the Constitution and almost 250 years of settled law. The radical majority has been rapidly disassembling longstanding administrative law, voting rights, women’s rights to choose their own reproductive healthcare, gun safety laws, bribery laws, and longstanding understanding of Constitutional principles such as immunity. They’ve also actually invited parties to bring lawsuits to the court to speed up their destruction (see US v. Trump).
The problem with the court, though, is not just the last few years. The current crisis has been building since Reagan nominated Robert Bork and Antonin Scalia and GHWB nominated Clarence Thomas. Bork was the original originalist, believing the Constitution should only be interpreted through the Founders’ eyes, ignoring what happened between 1789 and current day. It’s idiotic. The concept is radical and has brought us some of the worst SCOTUS decisions since the disastrous Dred Scott decision in 1857 that ruled that the Constitution did not protect enslaved Americans.
Chief Justice John Roberts has presided over this abortion (pun intended) and has inexplicably defended not only the court’s decisions, but has steadfastly resisted oversite from the Legislative branch and reforming itself. He has allowed Thomas to flout both the law and common sense, ignoring the fact that he (as well as Alito) have been bought and paid for by partisan and corporate interests.
Even while acknowledging the crisis at the SCOTUS, Biden has been reluctant to step in. He started a commission to study the court and make recommendations, but three years later, he’s done nothing. Only now, after he became a lame duck, is he proposing long needed change. Beyond waiting WAY too long to propose changes to the court, there’s no chance that they’ll get a fair hearing in the legislature. The Insurrectionist Party, which clings to a tiny majority in the House, has no interest in doing anything beyond putting its collective nose up TFG’s diapered ass, so reform bills will no nowhere for now. They LOVE the Court as it is, and only a change in November will make reform of the Court possible.
What can we do? Vote. Every single incumbent and candidate who supports TFG or this court must be defeated. That, of course, is not going to happen in one election, but it’s a start. And that’s the only chance we have of pulling us back from the brink.
Maybe Biden is sensing the momentum and looking toward his proposals having a good chance in 2025 if Dems can take back the House and keep the majority in the senate. As you pointed out, they’re DOA this year. Also, you said, got to get out the vote for many reasons in November.
Jeff Tiedrich discussed this today as well as the momentum-
https://open.substack.com/pub/jefftiedrich/p/kamalamentum-is-real-and-unstoppable?r=2di6n7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
1As Steve from Beaverton observes, perhaps waiting until a Presidential election year is a strategic move designed to underline how important keeping the Senate blue, and flipping the House back to Blue is to our country’s future.
This way, the MSM covers the issue just before the election, rather than saying “old news.”
2A Constitutional amendment requires turning a lot of states blue, too. We have a lot of work ahead of us.
(I love that the piece appeared in the WaPo and not the New York Times. F— around and find out, Mr. Sulzberger.)
3If you know anyone with a subscription to Rolling Stone mag, Leonard Leo blames all the scotus problems on corrupt Dems.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/supreme-court-leonard-leo-reforms-corruption-1235070458/
Paywall involved.
4