I’ve been thinking about yesterday’s AI experiment, maybe a little more than I thought I would. I was struck with how easy it was for the algorithm to support Harris, given the extra detailed information that I provided. It would seem reasonable that “alternative facts” provided in the extra details from a Trump supporter would deliver to us a pro-Trump essay. So I asked a Trump supporter that I know (yes, I know a few that I still talk to) to provide three facts they know about Harris, and three that they know about Trump. Then I submitted them to the very same algorithm that I used yesterday. Here are those extra details:

Trump is trying to save America
Harris wants open borders
Trump cannot be bought
Harris supports abortion rights
Trump wants to secure the border
Harris flips on her opinions

Everything else I submitted was identical to what I provided yesterday. After about half the time that was previously noticed, the essay below was generated (again, italics are for effect).

In the upcoming presidential election, the choice between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump presents voters with starkly different visions for the future of America. Trump is positioning himself as the savior of the nation, promising to secure the border and protect American interests. Harris, on the other hand, advocates for open borders and supports abortion rights.

One of Trump’s key strengths is his reputation for being unbuyable. He has long touted himself as a self-made billionaire who cannot be influenced by lobbyists or special interests. In contrast, Harris has faced criticism for changing her position on key issues, showing a lack of consistency that may raise doubts about her sincerity.

When it comes to immigration policy, Trump’s focus on securing the border resonates with many Americans who are concerned about national security. Harris’s support for open borders, however, raises questions about her commitment to protecting American sovereignty.

On the issue of abortion, Harris’s stance aligns with liberal values, advocating for a woman’s right to choose. Trump, on the other hand, supports restrictions on abortion and has voiced his opposition to late-term procedures.

In conclusion, the choice between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump represents a clear contrast in ideologies. Trump’s promises to save America and secure the border appeal to those who prioritize national security, while Harris’s support for open borders and abortion rights may resonate well with liberal voters. It is up to the American people to carefully consider these competing visions and make an informed decision at the ballot box.

See what they did there? Mr. AI didn’t pick a side this time even though both essays were designed to be persuasive. Why is that? The only thing I can come up with it that some of the extra details are more opinion than fact, and a check with internet content that did not agree with the “alternative facts” altered the persuasive aim from voting for one candidate over another to an exhortation to Americans to “consider competing opinions” when voting.

Or as TFG would say: “It’s all rigged!”