UPDATE: Mayor Sylvester Turner and County Commissioner Rodney Ellis have decided to take no shit from P.  They’ve written a joint letter to HUD Secretary Marcia Fudge requesting she “…halt all GLO actions associated with the current State Action Plan pending HUD’s review for appropriate and equitable distribution of funds to protect our city and region and build resilience as we adapt to an uncertain future.”  Looks like P overstepped here, and hopefully he’ll get sent to the woodshed for being a partisan asshole.  More to come.

ORIGINAL STORY: No, “P” hasn’t announced his run for the WH, but he’s most certainly started in that direction.  Since April, he’s been floating a run against criminally indicted Ken Paxton, who has somehow avoided trial for the last 5 years for securities fraud.  A demonstrated weirdo who has managed to be on the wrong side of every issue, Paxton has become weakened by scandal and become a target for being primaried, and it looks like P has him in his political sights.  P’s also been trying to shore up his conservative creds, even now pandering to the Texas GOP base which is all in on Trump, The Big Lie, and wishing death on everyone who disagrees politically.

P’s latest allocation of federal emergency funds for flood control in Texas counties is the hard evidence that exposes his pandering to the base.  In a $1 billion flooding mitigation grant from the federal government, Houston, which experienced 50% of the states’s damage from Harvey, received exactly…wait for it…zero.  That’s right, Houston which went for Biden in 2020 and continues to vote Democratic, was punished for voting against those who are supported by P’s base.  P has joined the deplorable wing of the GOP, happy to inflict suffering on fellow Texans, just to burnish his image for being an asshole for his base.  They think its funny.  Those who are suffering don’t.  Oh, and his spokesman lied, saying that they followed federal guidelines for distribution, but that’s bullshit, just like everything else coming out of P’s office.

The Bush’s are carpetbaggers, being New England bluebloods, but they’ve not generally been destructive to their adopted state.  W was stupid, manipulated by the corruption of Dick Cheney and others who duped him into invading Iraq.  HW was a milquetoast, but was a traditional diplomat who accomplished getting Saddam out of Kuwait. Jeb, also a milquetoast, got bulldozed by the Orange Menace.  What P is doing is more sinister…he’s playing to everything that’s bad about Americans, especially those who are all-in on Trump bullshit and corruption.  Urinating on the shoes of everyone in Houston is just a start.  It’s going to get worse.

The Texas state legislature and Governor Abbott have decided to abandon conservative principles, but then again what else is new? The mask has become the symbol for ideological warfare in America. There are all kinds of idiots out there, so there is little time to address them all. Suffice it to say, anyone that treats a mask as anything more than a piece of cloth or fabric is an idiot.

Enter Greg Abbott. The new law makes it illegal for a school or government building to require masks after June 4th. Considering the increasing rates of vaccinations and reducing positive rates it makes some sense on its face. Most adults are now fully vaccinated. So, there’s that.

The problem is two-fold. One of the problems exists on a philosophical level. Conservatives have been crying for generations about how much national and state governments have exercised too much control over local governments and the people. So, here the state government is barring the local governments and school districts from exercising local control. Does anyone else see the problem here?

The move at least follows a pattern with Abbott and the legislature throughout the pandemic. He is anything but consistent. From the beginning he has refused to lead in any positive way to limit the spread of the virus. He prefers to let local entities do the work. That would be fine except that whenever a local entity acts responsibly and safely he tells them they’re doing it wrong. This is another one of those instances.

The second problem is that while adults are getting vaccinated, children are not. Children under 12 cannot be vaccinated and those over 12 have just started. The good news is that by June 4th, most students and teachers will be home for the summer. Yet, there will still be summer school and who knows how many students will be vaccinated by August.

It is quite possible to overreact to something like this. For one thing, it is highly possible that most school districts would have reached this conclusion on their own. After all, the order doesn’t say you can’t wear masks. It just says that you can’t require it. However, some districts likely would have maintained the mask order if left to their own devices.

It also brings us back to the original point about masks. They have become a political symbol. I usually still wear one in public even though I am vaccinated. We have to wear one at work and it is just easier to do it rather than have to remember which places allow you to go without and which ones don’t. I increasingly get dirty looks in public because people automatically make an assumption about my politics based on my adherence to wearing a mask.

In this case they would be right, but that’s not really the point. The point is that a public safety measure shouldn’t be the flashpoint for a political debate. That’s true whether you look down at someone for wearing a mask or make fun of someone for not. Either way you are turning a piece of cloth or fabric into something it was never intended to be.

Gohmert: When I took it, did very well.. I’m sure that shocks people who think I’m the dumbest guy in Congress pic.twitter.com/4U63Qb3dYu

— Acyn (@Acyn) May 20, 2021

It happens slowly. It’s not unlike the tale of cooking the frog. See, you can’t put a frog in boiling water. It will hop out immediately. Slowly turn the heat up and the frog will be none the wiser. Sadly, many of us are no more observant or wise than the common frog.

January 6th happened. We all saw it happen live. We all know exactly how we felt while watching it. We remember the combination of fear, horror, and seething anger. What’s more, we saw all of the lawmakers on that day. We saw all of them cowering. We saw the fear and anger in their eyes. In many of them you can still see it.

Yet, for some the effort has already begun. Like the frog, they didn’t completely deny it immediately. No one would have bought that. We’re much too smart for that. It started with simple conflation with a little bit of gaslighting thrown in. Those attacks weren’t any worse than the Antifa attacks on our cities. After all, those “terrorists” caused more property damage and loss of life than the “misguided patriots” that attacked the capital.

Misguided patriots. I’m sure you caught that too. I’m sure your blood boiled just a little when you heard that phrase. Defense attorneys are already working overtime to exonerate those charged with the insurrection. It wasn’t their fault. They were duped. They are America loving patriots that just got sold a lemon by a barking con man. Of course, what gets to happen to the con man? Well, he gets secret service detail and he can look for voter fraud in every sand trap at Mar Lago.

If it stopped there it would be one thing. In the abstract, we all acknowledge that lawyers have to earn a living. Defense attorneys levy ridiculous defenses every day in court. It’s their job. When truth is not on your side you resort to any other means you possibly can. Yet, as we know it didn’t end there. The opposition is slowly turning up the heat on the frog.

Now, they are saying it wasn’t an insurrection at all. It was a normal, average day at the capital. The protesters were simply acting like any group of tourists would. Of course, this theory is pure fiction, so it gets a few variants. One such variant has the MAGA crowd as fine, upstanding citizens just protesting while Antifa operatives sewed discontent and performed most of the violence. Sure. Makes perfect sense until you actually think about it.

Others still acknowledged that something happened and yet want to conflate it with “all of the other violence” going around the country. That’s what happened when most of the GOP caucus opposed a 1/6 commission. They were given their demands. They got equal representation on the commission. Both parties have subpoena power. Still, they think the commission should be investigating Black Lives Matter and Antifa.

A political party that spent millions of tax payers money and hours of precious time investigating Benghazi think that an event with a similar death toll and far more injuries deserves little to no time. Seems just about right. This one was only an attack on our very own government. It was an attack on our very own soil. It was in an attack in a building that hasn’t seen one in its storied history. It was an attack on the very institutions that keep our government humming.

It’s been only a few months. Just wait until a few years have gone by. Just wait until a few decades have gone by. What was the scariest collective moment in many of our lives will become another footnote in history. It will become a mild mannered protest where a few people got hurt. Maybe it will rise to the level of a Kent St. in some people’s minds. Maybe it will completely disappear from others. At least that’s the goal and that is why the opposition must keep the story line going. Nothing as obtrusive as a commission seeking the truth can get in the way of the “truth.”

Dangerous territory, but I’m going there…

NOTE: Let it be known that I’m pretty much a heathen.  My father and grandfather were pulpit pounding, Bible thumping hell fire and brimstone preachers, and I got more Jesus and God pounded into me before I was 6 than most people get in a lifetime.  In my early adulthood, I took a hard look at Christianity, even taking classes in theology for my own edification.  The conclusion I came to in my early 30s was that deity-based faiths are pretty much mythology wrapped in threats of fiery death if one didn’t comply with certain precepts in those faiths.  I rejected this mythology in favor of a more tolerant approach to all faiths (and no faith).  Since then, I’ve followed my own path, studying everyone from Thomas Merton to Shunryu Suzuki, who brought Japanese Soto Zen buddhism to the US in the 1950s.  This is the perspective I bring to this discussion of the decades long conflict in Palestine, now commonly known as Israel.

I bring this up as I have had a number of conversations this past week or so after violence erupted in Israel again, where Israel is using war planes and missiles to indiscriminately kill Palestinians in Gaza as Hamas retaliates by firing uncontrolled rockets back at Israel.  Depending on who you talk to, Israel is simply defending itself or committing genocide, and to say it out loud, those opinions are pretty much divided between Jewish and non-Jewish.  Also, social conservatives almost always land on the side of Israel, some because they’re Bible thumpers, too, or just taking everlasting Republican positions.

The Israeli government always talks about how complicated all this is and they’re simply trying to stop terrorists from attacking them.  They like it complicated, because what they are really doing is committing genocide, and they don’t want you to see that.  That’s right; the very people who suffered mightily in the European holocaust are doing exactly the same thing to the Palestinians and have been for decades.  Before you go hair on fire, here’s the definition of genocide as defined in 1944 by a Jewish Polish legal scholar, Raphael Lemkin:

“More often [genocide] refers to a coordinated plan aimed at destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups so that these groups wither and die like plants that have suffered a blight. The end may be accomplished by the forced disintegration of political and social institutions, of the culture of the people, of their language, their national feelings and their religion. It may be accomplished by wiping out all basis of personal security, liberty, health and dignity. When these means fail the machine gun can always be utilized as a last resort. Genocide is directed against a national group as an entity and the attack on individuals is only secondary to the annihilation of the national group to which they belong.”

This definition has been widely adopted and refined by legal and historical scholars and referenced in international law.  The court that has jurisdiction over Palestine/Israel is the International Criminal Court, and the definition of genocide in Article VI of their governing statute is:

“…includes various acts “committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group” as such, including:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.”

By this definition, the Israeli government is, and has been, committing genocide against the Palestinian people by taking their property and ghettoizing where they remain, restricting movement, limiting employment, viciously enforcing draconian laws, indiscriminate killing, and even restricting their access to water.  That’s right, since 1967 it is illegal for Palestinians to access any water from the Jordan or the West Bank or even to collect rain water. The Israeli courts twist the laws against the Palestinians and are tools for taking property from them.  The more I study this issue, the more outraged I become.

In this last week, I’ve had some pretty tense discussions on social media and other forums, and I’m shocked at how so many of the people I’ve engaged simply parrot Israeli talking points.  Let’s be clear here.  Israel, with the backing of the United States and Britain, have annexed 100% of Palestinian lands since 1948, killing untold thousands, and committed atrocities that rival those of World War II and other violent conflicts.  The US sends about $4.5 billion a year to Israel, over 90% of which is for war making.  In contrast, the US sends the Palestinian Authority $500 million, over 75% of which is for humanitarian purposes.  Oh, and Trump even cut that off for the 4 years he infested the Oval Office; that order was reversed in April of this year. Since they started taking land in 1948, over 700,000 Palestinians were forced from their homes into refugee camps in Jordan and elsewhere.  In 1948 alone, Israelis destroyed and depopulated 700 Palestinian villages.  Israel has never, despite the UN declaration they used to take Palestine, officially recognized a Palestinian state or the right of Palestinians to live within its borders.

The excuses I’ve heard?  “Oh, those people in East Jerusalem are being evicted over a real estate dispute,” and, “The Arab world is huge; they can just move to another country,” and, “Israel is simply defending itself,” and “Hamas are terrorists firing rockets supplied by Iran,” and “So and so broke into a Jewish family’s house and murdered all of them.”  Oh, and then there’s this nugget, “There’s no such thing as Palestine; Palestine is the invention of the British.”  That’s pretty rich, since the name Palestine is derived from the Greek Philistia, which was the term used to describe these lands by Greek writers 3,000 YEARS AGO. It goes on and on, with excuse after excuse, most word for word propaganda from the Israeli government and its mouthpieces.  Essentially, normally good people rationalize the genocide happening in Israel by cherry picking information or outright lying to support their predispositions.  It’s pretty amazing.

“There’s no doubt again here this is ‘incremental genocide,’ as Ilan Pappé says. It’s been going on for a long time, the killings, the incredibly awful conditions of life, the expulsions that have gone on from Lydda in 1947 and ‘48, when 700 or more villages in Palestine were destroyed, and in the expulsions that continued from that time until today. It’s correct and important to label it for what it is. I want to emphasize today [that] these killings are part of a broader set of inhuman acts by Israel constituting international crimes, carried out by Israel over many years, going back to at least 1947 and 1948. They include crimes that aren’t talked about that much in the media or the press, the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and apartheid. These crimes can be prosecuted in the International Criminal Court and are defined there.”

The tragedy of this conflict is that the very people who suffered such mammoth atrocities and genocide at the hands of the Nazis are doing, and have been doing for decades, the same thing to the Palestinians.  AND, they’re doing that with American tax dollars.  That simply has to stop, and I’m going to keep talking about it.

Mariselle Quijano was running for reelection to our school board in position two. As an employee of the district we are somewhat dialed in to these things, but I don’t live in the district where I work. So, I try not to get involved. Quijano had served for 12 years, but it appears that the term is coming to an end. At least that is what we thought.

It was a 51/49 percentage account, so by all accounts it was close. Now, the school board president is refusing to seat the winner. The district has an official statement I have highlighted below, but it has turned nasty. Crystal Davila (the winner) has complained publicly about the process and if you simply read the statement below it would seem that the issue shouldn’t be in doubt.

When you go to the official school district website this is what they have on the election results. They have already had two meetings since the election. In one of those meetings the board voted to give all of us a three percent across the board raise. So, in other words, they are doing some pretty significant stuff.

This is where we get into the politics of it. Davila ran as part of a cohort of current and former educators that thought there should be more teacher representation on the board. Beyond that, labels of liberal and conservative rarely ever enter into it on this level. At least that’s true in Pasadena. Candidates never have a letter by their name and few mention anything that would hint of larger political issues. That changed during this race.

The school board president lobbied hard for the three incumbents in the race and labeled the three challengers as wanting to install a socialist agenda. I’m not exactly sure how one does that on a school board, but who knows. While she did not specifically label Davila as a socialist I suppose the implication was clear enough. Now, she is refusing to seat her. I can only wonder where they are getting this idea from about recounts. Is there anyone out there that they are deriving their inspiration from to stonewall the process? Can anyone think of anyone? Obviously, I don’t know if the current board are Trump supporters and that’s not my implication.

The implication is simple. When you see someone do something and it seems to be successful then it gives you rise to do it. That might be the most dangerous outcome from the 2020 election. Now, everyone has cause to challenge an election when the results come back differently they think they should have. Again, I’m an innocent bystander here. I didn’t vote in the election and really didn’t have an opinion until I was bombarded with talk about socialism. Now, it seems the citizens of Pasadena are not being adequately represented because a few on the board don’t like the results. That’s not how America works. At least that’s not how it’s supposed to work. Maybe the last presidential election will change all of that.