This is from Alfredo over at the Dairy Queen, everybody’s favorite hamburger flipper. It is the honest to God stone cold dead solid perfect truth.
Deep in your heart you always knew this was true, but now it’s the law.
Last Thursday, U.S. District Judge Andrea Wood ruled in the case of Foster v. Schock, No. 15-cv-03325 (N.D. Ill.) that a candidate’s campaign promises are worthless.
Or at least not actionable. An Aaron Schock donor, Howard Foster, had sued Schock for mail and wire fraud for soliciting campaign contributions on the basis that he was an honest politician.
Aaron Schock, a former Republican congressman from Illinois, was indicted on fraud charges last November after an investigation revealed that he allegedly used taxpayer money to fund lavish trips and events.
Judge Wood wrote, “The parties in this case have not cited any precedent involving fraud claims based upon campaign speech or solicitation of political candidates, and this Court’s research has revealed none. But courts reviewing communications in other contexts have long referred to campaign speech as the paradigm of unreliable puffery. . . . [G]eneric claims of honesty and integrity . . . are too vague to be considered definitive representations upon which Foster, or any reasonable person, could rely. The elevated skepticism directed toward political communications only pushed Schock’s statements further into the realm of inactionable puffery.”
Whether or not eventually Aaron Schock goes to jail, he will go down in history for setting the precedent that a candidate’s campaign promises are worthless.
There is no truth to the rumor that the champagne was flowing in the White House Counsel’s Office last Thursday upon learning of Judge Wood’s decision. In addition, there has been no independent verification of this alleged quote from White House Counsel Don McGahn: “Judge Wood is a brilliant jurist. The President is relieved to know that the Trump fortune will always be protected from the legal claims of 50,000 unemployed coal miners.”